Discrimination Rights for Pregnant Women

As an attorney defending people from employmenthealth conditions, provided the employee has worked
discrimination since 1991, the worst discrimination isfor at least a  year and worked at least 1250 hours
against a pregnant employee. Harassing or terminatingand the company has more than 50 employees within
a pregnant woman can be incredibly heinous. Firing aa 75 mile radius. The leave can be taken intermittently
woman who is pregnant leaves her with no income, no(an hour or hours at a time) but the limitation of 12
hope to find a new job and no health insurance. All thatweeks is absolute. If an employee takes more than 12
when she most needs to keep her job, her incomeweeks of unpaid FMLA leave, then they can be fired.
and medical insurance to take care of hospital andOtherwise an employer must return an employee to
other bills incurred in an expanding family.the same or similar position after returning from FMLA.
Very few employers will hire a woman who isUnfortunately the leave is unpaid and few people can
obviously pregnant. There is going to be time offafford a long term leave without income. A father is
needed for regular doctor visits. The potential foralso eligible for FMLA leave to care for his wife and
complications requiring extended time off. The nearbaby.
certainty that delivery of the baby will require weeksThere is an issue as to whether pregnant women are
of leave. Combined with the possibility that afterprotected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
nurturing her infant the mother will not want to return to(ADA) which was amended in September 2008 so
the job, makes getting a new job when you arethat more people are protected from discrimination
pregnant almost impossible.because of their disabilities. The Amendments to the
Federal, state and local laws do provide someADA are effective as of January 1, 2009. It reverses
protection from discrimination because of pregnancy. Inseveral U.S. Supreme Court decisions that narrowed
1978 Congress amended Title VII to include thethe scope of the ADA so that it was almost
Pregnancy Discrimination Act that prohibitsimpossible to prove that you were qualified for a job
discrimination because of pregnancy, childbirth, orand disabled. Protection under the ADA is now
related medical conditions. Employers cannot treatexpanded to include almost any substantial restriction
pregnant women differently, even if they are doing it toof any bodily function or system and for medical
try to protect the woman. A classic example was arecords which show an impairment of any major life
case brought by the EEOC against the Rustic Innfunction. However, because pregnancy is a 
Crabhouse, near the Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood Airport,temporary condition, it has been found to be outside
in which the restaurant admitted that it had re-assignedthe protection of the ADA. Whether that continues to
a waitress to the cash register because the ownersbe the analysis of the courts as they begin to interpret
considered carrying the large trays of crabs andthe ADA as amended, is yet to be seen.
walking around while customers were hammeringThe real importance of the lack of protection under
crabs, dangerous for the woman and fetus. In 2000the ADA is that employers do not have to
the Federal 11th Circuit Court of Appeals found theaccommodate pregnant employees. Pregnant women
restaurant’s policy regarding reassigning pregnantoften need accommodations. Frequent bathroom
waitresses was direct evidence of pregnancybreaks, inability to stand for long periods of time, help in
discrimination. Of course the restaurant admitted thislifting heavy objects, juice breaks, scheduling doctor
was their policy, which rarely happens.visits, limits on environmental stressors or contaminants
Florida law is less clear on pregnancy discriminationdo not have to provided by the employer. The
because it is not specifically mentioned as a protectedemployer can treat a pregnant employee like any
category under the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat.other employee without any special treatment or
§760. Most courts have agreed that Florida lawreasonable accommodation.
provides protection based on pregnancy, but there areHowever, there is another potential cause of action for
some lawyers who will disagree in defendingnegligent still birth if you can prove the employer was
companies that terminate pregnant women. Theresponsible for a miscarriage. This can happen when
leading case in Florida is O’Loughlin v. Pinchback,an employer intentionally harasses a pregnant
579 So. 2nd 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) finding that §760employee, forcing them to stand during a long shift,
protects women from discrimination because ofrefusing to assist them with moving heavy objects or
pregnancy. The theory is that gender discrimination asordering them to perform duties which caused the loss
protected by state law has the same construction asof a fetus. Damages in those cases run into the millions
gender discrimination laws in Title VII, so they will beof dollars, even though there is no ADA protection.
interpreted the same way and provide pregnancyIf you or someone you know is suffering discrimination
protection. See Kelly v. KD Construction of Florida, 866on the job because of their pregnancy, get legal
F.Supp. 1406, 1411 (S.D. Fla. 1994).protection immediately. Having a lawyer involved in
The Federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)protecting your rights could mean the difference
also provides for limited leave to accommodatebetween having a healthy baby that you can afford, or
pregnancy and serious medical conditions related tolosing a baby because the employer violated your
pregnancy.  The FMLA provides for up to 12 weeksrights.
of unpaid leave within a 12 month period for serious