Has Health and Safety Really Gone Mad? No, it Hasn't!

Health and Safety legislation has saved thousands ofso, with such sensationalised, distorted and
lives. Yet for some, it's become synonymous withnon-representational reporting, it can often seem that
today's compensation culture.the purpose of Health and Safety legislation is to
We're all familiar with what seems to be aapportion blame and metaphorically trip up the ignorant,
modern-day mantra of injury: No win no fee! Do yourather than to protect.
know someone, who knows someone, who once livedThis is not so. For all the jovial quips about Health and
with someone who had an accident at work? YouSafety gone mad, there remains the very real fact
could be in for a payout!that there is still a lot of room for improvement. The
Agreed, this is an exaggeration. But seemingly, withHealth and Safety at Work Act was introduced in
each advert break, we are bombarded by adverts1974, at a time when an average of 651 people a year
almost willing us to have an accident at work, so thatsuffered a work-related death. In the year 2007 -
we can be rewarded with a windfall.2008, this figure sat at 228. The lowest figure for
Health and safety has become big-money business.deaths since the Act was passed was between 2005
'Health and Safety has gone mad' is a phrase banded- 2006, a year when there were 217 deaths. The
about so freely that it has almost become acceptedfigure seems to have reached a plateau since.
as truth, and there are countless comical classicHealth and Safety can be a minefield for an employer,
examples to support this premise. In August 2009, thewhether they employ five people or five hundred, in
Daily Telegraph reported that the Trade Unionany sector, from conveyancing to construction. But
Congress was due to propose a motion the followingHealth and Safety legislation really isn't put in place to
month that 'High heels should be banned from theappoint blame, and the Government actively promotes
workplace'. The motion demanded that aguidelines which, if followed properly, will actually benefit
one-inch-maximum rule be slapped on employees'business. Guidelines from the Government's Health and
footwear.Safety Executive (HSE) aim to reduce the amount of
Tabled by the all-things-foot-related Society oftime and money lost through absences and sick leave;
Chiropodists and Podiatrists, the motion claimed thatboost company productivity and profits; increase staff
high heels worn in the workplace could cause allretention as well as reducing insurance premiums and
number of terrible foot and leg problems, and shouldlegal costs.
therefore be banished.A useful step-by-step guide of what an employer
Interestingly, the Union mostly comprises gentlemen.must do can be found on the HSE website which lists
In a similar vein, a certain grey-topped tabloid couldn'teverything from the ratio of toilet cubicles to
wait to report that, in the name of Health and Safety,employees necessary, to the importance of
Midlothian Council were leaving the lights switched on inEmployer's Liability Compulsory Insurance.
a derelict school building so that if intruders were toThe further understanding and training achieved in the
enter, they would be less likely to do themselves aHealth and Safety area, the more lives that will be
mischief because they couldn't see where they weresaved. Oh, but be warned, you probably won't read
going.about this in the tabloids, because it wouldn't make a
Health and Safety continues to suffer bad press. Andvery juicy story.